Last month, the redoubtable Jordan Peterson sat down with reporter Colm Flynn of EWTN (the Eternal Word Television Network) to discuss a variety of topics, including his wife Tammy’s miraculous recovery from cancer, the widespread loss of faith in the Catholic Church since the 1960s, and Pope Francis’ “fixation” on “climate change.”
The term “fixation” is a word used by psychologists to indicate a mental abnormality. Dr. Peterson is Professor Emeritus of Psychology at the University of Toronto. He taught at Harvard, where he was nominated for the Levenson Teaching Prize. He understands the meaning of the word “fixation.” He does not lack the boldness to speak what he perceives to be the truth of things.
Concerning climate change, Francis advocates for a powerful global government that is not subject to changing political conditions. Such a measure, he remarks, would “achieve the beginning of a new process marked by three requirements: that it be drastic, intense, and count on the commitment of all.” If this view does represent a “fixation” for a person who is the spiritual head of the Catholic Church, it certainly represents something that is draconian and unrealizable. At the same time, Francis has criticized pro-life advocates for being “obsessed with abortion,” nuns for praying too much, and philosophers for being clear. He has also opined that EWTN is “doing work for the devil.”
“I don’t see for the life of me,” Peterson commented, “what the Catholic Church has to do with the ‘climate crisis… Just the formulation is wrong; the priority is wrong; you save the world one person at a time.” He stressed the more important function of the leader of the Catholic Church as “Saving souls…not by worshipping Gaia.”
Peterson also criticized Francis for wanting to be relevant. But the pope’s notion of relevance appears to be conforming to the ways of the secular world. In John 17:9, we read Christ’s words: “not for the world do I pray.” In the Greek language, there are two distinct words for the “world.” One is gaia, which refers to the world that God created, the world that, according to Genesis, is “good.” The second word is aion, which refers to the era or the age. This is the man-made, secular world. Given the priority that Francis assigns to the climate crisis and his concerns about being relevant, one must ask whether he is not worshipping gaia as much as he is worshipping aion.
John the Evangelist explains why Christ would not pray for the world (aion). In his explanation, He draws a distinction between being “in the world” and being “of the world” (John 17:18-23). This world is not our permanent residence. We are destined to live with God in the next world. In being “fixated” on this world, we neglect the higher importance of the next world. In this regard, Peterson seems to be on good footing when he emphasizes the primary importance of the soul’s journey to Heaven and the secondary importance of life in this world.
The post Worshipping Gaia appeared first on LewRockwell.