There is more true awareness in social media about this terrorism case than in previous cases. That shot surely was fired by a professional soldier or sharpshooter, not Tyler Robinson. The Utah governor broke the news that Tyler Robinson is “not cooperating”:
“Charlie Kirk’s alleged killer is ‘not co-operating’ with authorities and has not confessed to carrying out the shooting, Utah’s governor Spencer Cox has said.” – BBC, September 14.
It’s good that he is not cooperating, means he’s lucid. His mother and father are like his main accusers. Since he rejected the accusations at the police station, we may wonder how his family, and its retired deputy sheriff friend, got him to go there. Consider how the parents made their accusation (NYT news, emphasis mine):
“… she saw a photograph of the gunman on the news and thought that the image of a slender young man dressed in dark clothes… looked like her 22-year-old son, Tyler Robinson, law-enforcement officials said.” “Mr. Robinson’s mother showed the photo to her husband, who agreed that the gunman looked like their son.”
His father said his son “implied” he was the shooter in a phone call between the two (CNN). Now that Tyler has failed to “cooperate,” will the parents still accuse him? Such accusation grounds – looked like, implied – are meaningless, but there’s a large cache of “evidence” gathered again against another very young man with no prior criminal record, who was a “stellar student in high school,” and who went from “scholarship student to wanted man.” (NYT)
Let’s look at the evidence against him, which actually exonerates him. We may not agree totally, but we should agree on the main facts.
.- There is a text, allegedly of Robinson, saying that he had hidden the rifle somewhere in the university. That would explain why there’s no rifle in the stairway pictures. In the second pictures released, one shows him entering a building – we see the outside area. The first two pictures released look less like Tyler, so to speak (they don’t look like him at all to me), and appear to be taken higher up. The second ones show a closer look-alike, but there is no clear shot of his face. I see they’re two different men and neither one is Tyler Robinson. In this link, you can zoom these first two pictures. Reporters should ask for more pictures, clearer ones; and the defense lawyer should.
The second released pictures can be seen in this link.
FBI releases new photos of the suspect in Charlie Kirk’s shooting.
So, the pictures are not of who they pretend to be (in my eyes), and they’re two different impostors. Why not only one impostor for all fake pictures (and videos)? It’s a terrorism case, that’s why.
One might as well ask why, on 9-11, the second “plane” went through the southern wall without exploding; why or how does it explode, in all videos, only after it is totally inside; also ask why, after it explodes, the plane nose emerges intact through the northern wall before exploding too (I treated this in an article titled “On Terrorism”) – and for that matter even ask why it’s like nobody notices.
.- The decisive evidence that conclusively proves Tyler Robinson was set up as “the patsy” is the video showing “him” jumping down from the roof as he escapes. In all pictures the culprit goes up the stairway, and someone could say the rifle was waiting upstairs, but there is no justification for the absence of the rifle in the escape video. He left the rifle in the woods nearby, so it has to be seen or noticed in this video. It’s not, though.
.- It’s a bolt-action Mauser rifle (98 model). He has something that waves in his hand, but we see a light object, not such a rifle. He probably had a plastic in his hand with a black sweater around it.
.- Pointlessly, he allegedly ran away with the rifle to leave it in the wooded area close to the university. If he had no rifle to be seen, he might as well take it with him or throw it away somewhere else. Some could say that the leg started hurting from such a high jump, and that he couldn’t carry it anymore, but that’s outside the video (which shows no rifle), and this video is finally the most conclusive evidence that Tyler Robinson is innocent of this crime, and therefore just a patsy set up by the perpetrator(s). Determining the perpetrator(s) requires a deep investigation, with access to information, etc., which a private citizen doesn’t have. However, based on what is published, one can detect and point to the evil supernatural power behind this terrorism.
.- The video makes it look like it’s an easy jump. We have problems with this jump too. The police need to analyze this jump – it’s not easy like that.
The bolt-action Mauser rifle, reported to be an “older model,” weighs about nine pounds. It’s not a foldable rifle; it’s not in the backpack. Normally, anyone would throw the rifle down before jumping from a building, to survive the jump. But not the figure in this video. Those who don’t own such a rifle may consider a ten-pound dumbbell for comparison. There’s no way someone with Tyler’s built jumps from that height with a rifle in his right hand, landing and running like in this video. Even without the rifle, it’s not doable.
He jumps from the 12th rung of the ladder seen below in the link at the end. To the roof top, it’s more than 16 rungs of this fireman’s ladder which doesn’t reach that high. This lower jumping spot is still a ceiling height. Even from something like 2 meters, you may hurt yourself if you try to land in a squat position like he does.
This unbelievable jump is in fact the stuff of terrorism, and it’s a crucial type moment: The authorities must overcome this deception. The deception is the enemy itself. If people in general will swallow impossible facts with their ridiculous scenarios, then they cannot fight terrorism. It cannot be that if the evil is too big you regress into childhood. Someone who didn’t make that jump is being blamed for this attack.
Consider the frame of a door. He is jumping from higher than that. Let’s not forget, for a second, that this shooter supposedly had a rifle that is about nine pounds heavy with ammunition (chances are a Mauser rifle was not even used).
The lowest point to which his hamstrings reach upon landing is to a “parallel squat” level, as you see at 0.08 in the video below (freezing it), and he’s already rising up at 0.09, which is impossible really. The figure doesn’t even land in a deep squat position – doesn’t fall on the ground as part of landing. The rifle, which he would have in his right hand, doesn’t hit the ground; the right hand doesn’t even touch the ground. Can Tyler Robinson do this? It lands like a comics figure (superman, spider-man, that kind of thing). He picks up something from the ground, but no rifle.
The figure in this escape video most definitely is not Tyler Robinson. Such a reality determines what is happening in the attack – that it’s a terrorist attack again. This video’s actual details should be studied and examined well by the FBI (perhaps by some of the other American intelligence agencies too).
What is it if not Tyler Robinson? The case against him falls by its own weight. It could be computer graphics, I suppose (but don’t know). It could be directly supernatural evil. It’s like the second 9-11 “plane.” What is that? Well, it can’t be a commercial plane for sure, unless a United Airlines plane can demonstrate that its parts go through concrete and steel walls like the one on 9-11 does in all the videos, whether they are from the TV networks or from others. A real investigation of 9-11 could begin right there (it won’t ignore it!); a serious rebuttal may appear funny involuntarily if their scenario is too absurd (I wrote an article, by the way, titled “Book Adventures at eBay,” in a light vein).
I say that a human being cannot jump from the height this figure does, landing in a squat position where the butt does not touch the ground. For example, no professional football wide receiver can do that. The New York Times reported that Tyler likes to read comic books and play video games – nobody says he’s an athlete. Wouldn’t you agree by now that it’s 100% sure he is not the jumper in the video?
I described the terrorism “power” in “On Terrorism” as being “hate” itself, as having zero intelligence, thus zero power in reality. If it’s a circumscribed power, it’s a damned power, which we can notice. Is the supernatural attacker here the same one as the 9-11 attacker (rhetorical question)? Exactly the same one in all such terrorist attacks (I’m not digressing). What seconds 0.08-0.09 show is better appreciated at the lowest playback speed of 0.25.
The post On the Assassination of Charles Kirk appeared first on LewRockwell.