Debt vs Autonomy

Policies and practices designed to drive either individuals or Nation-States into debt have long been a preferred method for political coercion, cooptation, enslavement, incremental dominance and control. A form of subtle, creeping indentured servitude. Neither individuals, communities, businesses nor Nation-States can be free when they are indebted (financially or otherwise) to another. This subtle method of control of both Nation-States and their citizens has been consciously, intentionally, and strategically deployed by central banks for centuries. This is the method which the World Economic Forum, itself a guild representing the interests of the largest corporations (and their controlling owners), seeks to transform itself into a fascist totalitarian world government.

Furthermore, as so crudely and bluntly illustrated in the case of the arbitrary freezing of financial assets belonging to political opponents by Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland (both WEF-trained “young leaders”), if given opportunity and technical capability to directly deprive political dissenters of access to existing owned financial assets, tyrants will act arbitrarily and capriciously to directly create financial dependency by weaponizing the system which enables global coordination of central bank transactions. This Trudeau/Freeland-tactic was not a novel innovation, rather it represented a crude, transparent, explicit deployment (at the level of individual dissenters) of a financial weapon that has been enabling surreptitious political control of both individuals and Nation-States throughout recorded history.

If you occasionally experience a vague sense that you are being intentionally controlled via indebtedness, you should probably listen to that internal voice. To illustrate with examples from the present, the most common explanation for why physicians have not spoken up about the weaponization and manipulation of public health information and policies during the “Coronacrisis” is that they are deeply indebted due to the loans taken out to enable their extended and expensive education, and have no practical choice other than to comply with the mandates imposed on them by government, insurance agencies, and their host institutions (academic or private hospital chains). They have a profound financial conflict of interest- comply or go bankrupt. In large part, the physicians and medical scientists who have spoken up about the compromised medical ethics, regulatory standards, mis- and disinformation propagated by governments and WHO (including intentionally withheld or manipulated medical and epidemiological information) have been financially independent, often senior with high status or established independent medical practices, or otherwise have been decoupled from mechanisms or institutions which have been weaponized to force compliance with centralized edicts. In other words, the majority of those who have spoken out have freedom to speak BECAUSE they are (relatively) financially independent.

To provide a broader historic example that helps illustrate the point, a case has been made that the Stock Market crash of 1929 was engineered by the central banks. This hypothesis is grounded in the observation that Goldman Sachs, Lehman Bank and others profited from the Crash of 1929. In a quote which many will find oddly relevant to the “Coronacrisis”, House Banking Committee Chairman Louis McFadden (D-NY) said of the Great Depression:

“It was no accident. It was a carefully contrived occurrence…The international bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so they might emerge as rulers of us all”.

U.S. Congressman Louis McFadden, speaking about the 1929 Stock Market Crash. Interestingly, Louis McFadden died of poisoning shortly thereafter.

At the macro scale, the same holds true for Nation-States and those who seek to function as political leaders of either Nations or States. The leaders functionally must sell their autonomy to the highest bidders in order to gain office. They have very little operational autonomy, even if they have good intentions to implement constructive and adaptive changes which will advance the interests of their state or country. The central banks and those who control them actively promote political forces and agendas (including war!) to drive Nation-States into indebtedness so that they can functionally extract a form of rent and control the politics of these captured organizations so that the banks and their owners can control global affairs to benefit their commercial interests. Please see “The Federal Reserve Cartel: The Rothschild, Rockefeller and Morgan Families” by John Morse for a detailed historical analysis of these strategies and behaviors. Both Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton foresaw this. Jefferson fought to preserve the autonomy of United States citizens, while Alexander Hamilton fought to enable and empower what were essentially the financial oligarchy of his day – which has persisted remarkably intact through time!

Yet another example. The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) is the most powerful bank in the world, a global central bank for the Eight Families who control the private central banks of almost all Western and developing nations. The first President of BIS was Rockefeller banker Gates McGarrah- an official at Chase Manhattan and the Federal Reserve. McGarrah was the grandfather of former CIA director Richard Helms. The Rockefellers- like the Morgans- had close ties to London. A case has been made that the Rockefellers and Morgans were just “gofers” for the European Rothschilds. BIS is owned by the Federal Reserve, Bank of England, Bank of Italy, Bank of Canada, Swiss National Bank, Nederlandsche Bank, Bundesbank and Bank of France.

Read the Whole Article

The post Debt vs Autonomy appeared first on LewRockwell.

Leave a Comment

Generated by Feedzy